MOSCOW—If you’re inclined to believe Igor Panarin, and the Kremlin wouldn’t mind if you did, then President Barack Obama will order martial law this year, the U.S. will split into six rump-states before 2011, and Russia and China will become the backbones of a new world order.
Panarin might be easy to ignore but for the fact that he is a dean at the Foreign Ministry’s school for future diplomats and a regular on Russia’s state-guided TV channels. And his predictions fit into the anti-American story line of the Kremlin leadership.
Other Stories You Might Like
Russia and China Push for New Global Currency (345)
Felonious Munk On America’s Bill Problem (0)
Montana Medical Marijuana Growers Accused of Trafficking (0)
Obama Cancels Bush’s European Missile Defense (8)
U.S. Image Abroad Surges Under Obama (1105)
Obama Picks Regina Benjamin as Surgeon General (0)
What In The World Are We Going To Do With All These Chicken Feet (103)
Obama Warns Iran to Comply or Get Delt With (32)
US Should Plan 2nd Fiscal Stimulus – Govt Adviser (2)
Economic Crisis Could Accelerate B.R.I.C. to Power (0)
I think all should pay attention to the laws passed in the US over the last 8 years and this includes recently passed laws from the Obama administration as well…This could partly happen in a serious way…maybe not the splitting apart in quite this way, but the martial law thing could be more plausible….
That’s picture is pretty tight.
And you pessimist need to chill. Who cares what the Russians think. We will blow thier ass up if they keep talking that sh!T! ha
And if Obama gets out of hand, someone will handle his ass too. America Forever!
We aren’t at Doomsday, yet…but you can see it from here
link to references here: http://tinyurl.com/cmzt92
The ‘bibliography’ is ten pages long…and growing.
Panarin may have gotten a few details wrong…
For example, barring military invasion, which was an implied threat in Panarin’s paper, Alaska will more likely come under Japanese, Chinese and Canadian economic ‘influence’ as well as Russian. Of course, that begs the question: Why would an expert in InfoOps, geo-politics and world geography get such a detail “wrong?” Because he’s stupid? A fool? …or because he was trying to accomplish something that the eyes of the West would overlook and dismiss?
…but he still has a pretty good point. …if you do a bit of research, you’ll figure out what that point is.
Besides, most of the people ‘reporting’ on this story have never actually seen his paper, let alone read it. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be saying what they’re saying.
that’s a sick picture